Hindu Voice Team: The recent arrival of the U.S. Navy’s USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62) in Bangladesh — officially labeled as a “goodwill visit” — has triggered waves of controversy and suspicion across South Asia. Critics in both Bangladesh and India are warning that this so-called “friendly” naval presence could have far-reaching strategic consequences, threatening not only Bangladesh’s independence but also India’s regional sovereignty and security.
The U.S. warship anchored at Chattogram Port earlier this week, welcomed ceremonially by the Bangladesh Navy’s BNS Abu Ubaidah. According to official statements, the purpose of the visit is “to enhance bilateral naval cooperation, conduct goodwill exchanges, and strengthen maritime partnership.” But observers dismiss these explanations as hollow, calling the move a veiled demonstration of power and influence in the Bay of Bengal region.
Critics accuse Dr. Muhammad Yunus’s interim administration of acting under Western pressure and “selling out” Bangladesh’s sovereignty to Washington. “No country in history has ever sent a guided-missile destroyer as a gesture of friendship,” one political analyst remarked. “Calling this a goodwill visit is not diplomacy — it’s submission.”
Political commentators across Dhaka and New Delhi are also pointing to the wider implications of this act. The Bay of Bengal — a vital maritime gateway connecting South and Southeast Asia — is now turning into a strategic chessboard where American interests may directly clash with India’s traditional sphere of influence.
Analysts argue that the U.S. naval presence in Bangladesh could be an early move toward establishing a permanent strategic foothold in the region, effectively surrounding India’s eastern flank under the guise of partnership and security cooperation.
Indian defense observers are reportedly monitoring the situation closely, viewing the docking of the USS Fitzgerald as more than just a “friendly port call.” A senior Indian security expert, speaking anonymously, said: “If the U.S. begins frequent naval visits or gains access to ports like Chattogram, it will mark a fundamental shift in South Asia’s security architecture — and that poses a serious strategic challenge to India.”
The timing of the visit — amid Bangladesh’s economic turmoil, political unrest, and Dr. Yunus’s growing dependence on Western support — has further fueled speculation that the so-called “goodwill mission” is in fact a calculated display of geopolitical leverage.
Government sources in Dhaka, however, continue to describe the visit as “purely symbolic” and “focused on naval cooperation.” But the public isn’t convinced.
Citizens are asking — Can a warship loaded with missiles truly represent goodwill? Or is it a signal that Bangladesh’s foreign policy is slipping under foreign control?
Regional experts warn that if Dhaka’s leadership fails to recognize the long-term implications, the entire Bay of Bengal may soon transform into a strategic arena dominated by Western powers — reducing both Bangladesh and India to spectators in their own neighborhood.
As one commentator summarized: “When a nation opens its ports to a foreign military, it opens its sovereignty to doubt. And when that happens in South Asia, it’s not just one country’s problem — it’s the region’s problem.”
Unless the Yunus administration rethinks its direction, observers fear that Bangladesh could become a pawn in a new geopolitical game — one that risks destabilizing the delicate balance of power across the subcontinent.